Practice and Forgetting Effects on Vocabulary Memory: An Activation-Based Model of the Spacing Effect
By Philip I. Pavlik, John R. Anderson. Cognitive Sciences, 2005
343 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/623c8cf67b4347007184887b524c29176b55a1d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Andreas Krause
- Pietro Perona
- Adish Kumar Singla
- Yisong Yue
- Oisin Mac Aodha
- Peter F Delaney
- Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen
- Anette Hunziker
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Andreas Krause
- Bernardo Pereira Nunes
- Pietro Perona
- Adish Kumar Singla
- Yisong Yue
- Qing Wang
- Oisin Mac Aodha
- Peter F Delaney
Citations in the corpus
- Teaching Multiple Concepts to Forgetful Learners (2018, methodology): “Power-law and exponential functions are two popular ways of modeling the forgetting curve (for detailed discussion, see [27, 41, 24, 40]).”
- Spacing and Testing Effects: A Deeply Critical, Lengthy, and At Times Discursive Review of the Literature (2010, background): “…presentations show superior consolidation when the same neurons are repeatedly activated, suggesting the second and subsequent presentations would show slower forgetting over time—a result consistent with several mathematical models of the spacing effect (Pavlik & Anderson, 2005; Reed, 1977).”
- Teaching Multiple Concepts to a Forgetful Learner (2018, methodology): “Optimal scheduling with spaced repetition models [13] and [17] studied the ACT-R model and the MCM model respectively for the optimal review scheduling problem: the goal is to maximize a learner’s retention through an intelligent review scheduler.”
- Knowledge Tracing: A Survey (2022, background): “In addition to these, psychological studies about the learning behavior [79] and forgetting behavior [53] of students have also suggested additional factors, such as the time lapse between a student’s diferent interactions and the number of times on practicing learning materials, to be considered wh”