Exhaustive Interpretation of Complex Sentences
By Robert van Rooij, Katrin Schulz. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2004
325 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/623964135a9ca738f4544a553ab10efd3dc60a0b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Roni Katzir
- Emmanuel Chemla
- Danny Fox
- Raj Singh
- Robert van Rooij
- Philippe Schlenker
- Shoichi Takahashi
- S. Hulsey
In Language and Linguistics
- Robert van Rooij
- Danny Fox
- Emmanuel Chemla
- Raj Singh
- Roni Katzir
- Luka Crnič
- Philippe Schlenker
- Benjamin Spector
Citations in the corpus
- Structurally-defined alternatives (2007, methodology): “Secondly, I will avoid talking about the relation of implicatures to exhaustivity in answers, as in the proposals of van Rooij and Schulz (2004), Sevi (2005), Spector (2007), and others.”
- Universal Implicatures and Free Choice Effects: Experimental Data (2009, methodology): “S∧( ∧ a∈A¬a) is not contradictory} A.2 Multiple replacements and universal inferences It has been claimed that globalist approaches may predict universal inferences such as (25a), see van Rooij & Schulz (2004), Spector (2006), Chemla (2009c).”
- Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for theories of implicature and child development (2016, unknown): “…the speaker is ignorant about the truth value of each disjunct (see note 14), and ‘minimal-worlds’ approaches to exhaustivity (e.g., Spector 2005, van Rooij and Schulz 2004, Schulz and van Rooij 2006) would predict an exclusive-disjunction reading instead of a conjunctive one (see Spector 2015…”
- Conjunctive interpretation of disjunction (2010, methodology): “In fact, this pragmatic interpretation rule is better known as the exhaustive interpretation of a sentence (e.g., Groenendijk & Stokhof 1984 , van Rooij & Schulz 2004 , Schulz & van Rooij 2006 , Spector 2003 , 2006 ).”
- Maximize Presupposition! and local contexts (2011, background): “…implicatures are generated at the root, or also in embedded positions (e.g., Grice (1967), Cohen (1971), Chierchia (2004), Sauerland (2004), van Rooij and Schulz (2004), Fox (2007), Russell (2006), Chierchia et al. (2008), Chemla and Spector (2009), Geurts and Pouscoulous (2009), and much…”
- On the characterization of alternatives (2011, background): “…often been assumed, as in much of the literature following Grice (1989), that the members of NSI (A, S ) are all strictly stronger than S , but see van Rooij and Schulz (2004), Spector (2006), Fox (2007a), Chierchia, Fox, and Spector (2008), and Chemla (2009), among others, for arguments that NSI…”