Effective Learning in Dynamic Environments by Explicit Context Tracking
By Gerhard Widmer, Miroslav Kubat. 1993
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Dimitris Tsipras
- Shibani Santurkar
- Florian Tramèr
- Nicholas Carlini
- Aleksander Madry
- Yoshua Bengio
- Marta Ruiz Costa-jussà
- Matthias Hein
Citations in the corpus
- Continual Lifelong Learning in Natural Language Processing: A Survey (2020, background): “Models become less accurate over time, for instance, due to the changing distribution of data – the phenomenon known as concept drift (Schlimmer and Granger, 1986; Widmer and Kubat, 1993).”
- Continuous Domain Adaptation with Variational Domain-Agnostic Feature Replay (2020, background): “…problem has been identified in many practical scenarios that tackle stream data, often with different terminologies, e.g., virtual concept drift (Widmer & Kubat, 1993; Tsymbal, 2004), feature change (Gao et al., 2007), and many others summarized in the survey papers (Gama et al., 2014; Ditzler…”
- Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts (1996, result): “Similar results were achieved in experiments with a more complex world (see Widmer and Kubat, 1993).”
- Learning under Concept Drift: an Overview (2010, background): “Sometimes change in p(X|c) (independently whether it affects p(c|X) or not) is referred as virtual drift and change in p(c|X) is referred as real drift [153].”
- Concept drift detection via competence models (2014, methodology): “Concept drift can be categorized into two basic types: virtual concept drift (or drift in data distribution), and real concept drift (or drift in decision concepts) [8].”
- BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shift (2020, background): “Robustness to distribution shift has been the focus of a long line of work in machine learning [SG86; WK93; KHA99; Shi00; SKM07; Qui+09; Mor+12; SK12].”
- Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts (2004, unknown): “…received considerable attention among theoreticians (e.g., Angluin,1988; Maass, 1991; Helmbold, Littlestone, & Long, 1992) as well as practitioners(e.g., Schlimmer & Granger, 1986; Langley, Gennari, & Iba, 1987; Kilander &Jansson, 1993; Kubat, 1989, 1993; Salganico , 1993a; Widmer & Kubat, 1993).”