NUTRITIONAL CONDITION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK
By R. Cook, J. Cook, L. Mech. 2004
100 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61a8dfdd3117baf381f439d6043ea30b4528110d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- M. Boyce
- Evelyn H. Merrill
- D. Fortin
- Jacqui Frair
- J. Forester
- P. J. White
- W. Ripple
- Douglas W. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Migration of northern Yellowstone elk: implications of spatial structuring (2010, background): “…and after wolf restoration would be similar because of overriding nutritional demands for quality forage during both summer and winter (Cook 2002; Cook et al. 2004); spatial structuring on the winter range would affect the timing of migration and selection of summer ranges (Craighead et al.…”
- Diel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear (2017, unknown): “On the other hand, concurrent fine-scale, individual-level data on movement, body condition, and pregnancy rate indicated elk selected for open areas (Fortin et al. 2005, Mao et al. 2005) and maintained body fat and pregnancy rate (Cook et al. 2004, White et al. 2011, Proffitt et al. 2014).”
- Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes (2005, methodology): “The capturing, handling and collection of radiotelemetry data were described by Cook et al. (2004) .”
- Trophic cascades in a multicausal world: Isle Royale and Yellowstone (2014, background): “However, a concern in attributing its influence in this case is that pregnancy rates of NR elk, determined by serum protein (pregnancy-specific protein B), did not decline after wolves were reintroduced (Cook et al. 2004, White et al. 2011).”
- Adaptive models for large herbivore movements in heterogeneous landscapes (2005, background): “2004), and are related to pregnancy probabilities (Cook et al. 2004).”
- Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. (2009, methodology): “Details of the animal capture and the study area are described elsewhere (Cook et al. 2004, Forester et al. 2007).”