Diel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear

By Michel T. Kohl, D. Stahler, Matthew C. Metz, J. Forester, M. Kauffman, N. Varley, P. J. White, Douglas W. Smith, Daniel R. MacNulty. bioRxiv, 2017

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A ‘landscape of fear’ (LOF) is a map that describes continuous spatial variation in an animal’s perception of predation risk. The relief on this map reflects, for example, places that an animal avoids to minimize risk. Although the LOF concept is a potential unifying theme in ecology that is often invoked to explain the ecological and conservation significance of fear, quantified examples of a LOF over large spatial scales are lacking as is knowledge about the daily dynamics of a LOF. Despite theory and data to the contrary, investigators often assume, implicitly or explicitly, that a LOF is a static consequence of a predator’s mere presence. We tested the prediction that a LOF in a large-scale, free-living system is a highly-dynamic map with ‘peaks’ and ‘valleys’ that alternate across the diel (24-hour) cycle in response to daily lulls in predator activity. We did so with extensive data from the case study of Yellowstone elk (Cervus elaphus) and wolves (Canis lupus) that was the original basis for the LOF concept. We quantified the elk LOF, defined here as spatial allocation of time away from risky places and times, across nearly 1000-km2 of northern Yellowstone National Park and found that it fluctuated with the crepuscular activity pattern of wolves, enabling elk to use risky places during wolf downtimes. This may help explain evidence that wolf predation risk has no effect on elk stress levels, body condition, pregnancy, or herbivory. The ability of free-living animals to adaptively allocate habitat use across periods of high and low predator activity within the diel cycle is an underappreciated aspect of animal behavior that helps explain why strong antipredator responses may trigger weak ecological effects, and why a LOF may have less conceptual and practical importance than direct killing.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4408ab4a6178433101632e448b9af8383d729a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

  1. M. Power
  2. J. Brashares

In Ecology

  1. Joel s. Brown
  2. M. Power
  3. J. Brashares
  4. E. Shochat
  5. Burt P. Kotler
  6. M. Hayward
  7. D. Morris
  8. P. Banks

In Small Animals

  1. J. Brashares

Citations in the corpus