The training of school-leavers: Complementarity or substitution?
By Michiel van Smoorenburg, Rudolf van der Velden. 2000
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Education, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/619073f03504844840f435ee93462dacce44e1b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Education
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Overeducation at the Start of the Career: Stepping Stone or Trap? (2013, methodology): “For a similar procedure and discussion in the case of realized matches measures, see Verhaest and Omey (2010). 5 This incidence using the modified self-assessment measure is very similar to the incidence using the standard subjective measure.”
- The Impact of Overeducation and its Measurement (2006, unknown): “Also Hersch (1991), van Smoorenburg & van der Velden (2000) and Verhaest & Omey (2002) found a negative relation between overeducation and training participation.”
- Fitting to the job: the role of generic and vocational competenties in adjustment and performance (2003, background): “…indicating that more educated workers train more because the available human capital is an input in the production of new human capital or because workers who are better learners invest more in both schooling and training (Bartel and Sicherman, 1998; Smoorenburg and Velden, 2000; Stasz, 2001).”