Representations of 'trolls' in mass media communication: a review of media-texts and moral panics relating to 'internet trolling'

By Jonathan Bishop. 2014

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Mark D. Griffiths

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Daria J. Kuss
2. Mark D. Griffiths
3. Gabriel Bonilla-Zorita
4. Rachel Grieve
5. Evita March
6. P. Jonason
7. Zsolt Demetrovics
8. Kağan Kırcaburun

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Evita March

Citations in the corpus

• Online Dating and Problematic Use: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “According to March et al. (2017), there is a relationship between dysfunctional impulsivity and antisocial behaviours, such as trolling (i.e. the act of being provocative, offensive or threatening [Bishop 2014]) on the Tinder app.”
• Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity (2017, background): “In general, trolling can be defined as communication online with intention of being provocative, offensive, or menacing (Bishop, 2014), in an attempt to trigger conflict and cause victims distress for the trolls own amusement (Buckels, Trapnell, & Paulhus, 2014).”