Factor Analysis: Exploratory and Confirmatory

464 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Emotional intelligence can make a difference: The impact of principals’ emotional intelligence on teaching strategy mediated by instructional leadership (2018, methodology): “…eigenvalues > 1.00; (b) at least three items which were conceptually aligned; (c) items with regression loadings of > 0.30; (d) all cross-loadings had to be < 0.30; and (e) modification indices were utilized to identify and remove items with strong cross-factor loadings (Bandalos and Finney, 2010).”
Can You Really Measure That? Combining Critical Race Theory and Quantitative Methods (2018, background): “Aspirational and resistant capital contained items that did not sufficiently load onto a factor, and a decision was made on the best structure and items to include (Bandalos & Finney, 2010).”
Structural Equation Modeling in Language Testing and Learning Research: A Review (2011, methodology): “Further, the reporting practice did not follow Bandalos and Finney (2010), Mueller and Hancock (2010), and Cheung and Rensvold (2002, when testing measurement invariance).”
A Tutorial on Interpreting Bifactor Model Scores (2013, methodology): “…theory behind the instrument, compare the fit of the models, perhaps additionally make some small modifications to either the model or the instrument based on the empirical results, and cross-validate with another sample if changes were made (Bandalos & Finney, 2010; Boomsma, 2000; Mueller, 1997).”