Mastering Calculations in Linear and Nonlinear Mechanics

By Pierre Ladevèze, J. Pelle. 2004

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/610f09656c7c103f57e31aa5288daddd62477a48

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Strict and effective bounds in goal‐oriented error estimation applied to fracture mechanics problems solved with XFEM (2010, methodology): “The interested reader should refer to [3] for details.”
Calculation of strict error bounds for finite element approximations of non‐linear pointwise quantities of interest (2010, methodology): “Such an admissible solution can be effectively used to derive a strict, computable upper bound of the global error Eglob [3].”
Strict error bounds for linear solid mechanics problems using a subdomain-based flux-free method (2009, methodology): “Three groups of techniques exist within that general class (see [2] for a more detailed review, and [3,4] for recent journal special issues on the subject): one based on the so-called constitutive relation error, by Ladevève and co-workers (see for example [5]); another based on the comparison of th”
Hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin p‐adaptivity for wave propagation problems (2013, background): “But a posteriori error estimators have a non trivial computational overhead when recovery techniques are used [56], or when equilibrated fluxes must be computed [57] and also in flux-free implementations [58].”
Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin with degree adaptivity for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations ✩ (2014, unknown): “However, a posteriori error estimators have a non trivial computational overhead when recovery techniques are used [40], or when equilibrated ﬂuxes must be computed [41], and also in the more eﬃcient ﬂux-free implementations [42].”