Environmental policy in Europe : the Europeanization of national environmental policy
By A. Jordan, D. Liefferink. 2004
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/610e7cbc6805b1c42ec68dc7eca601ebcfdbbe8b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Christoph Knill
- S. Heichel
- M. Debus
- Bas Arts
- J. Ooijevaar
- D. Liefferink
- J. Kamstra
- Daniel W. Drezner
Citations in the corpus
- Do parties matter in internationalised policy areas? The impact of political parties on environmental policy outputs in 18 OECD countries, 1970-2000 (2010, background): “…effects are well documented for international regimes and institutions (Holzinger et al. 2008a; Miles et al. 2002), it is especially the domestic impact of EU legislation that is of major relevance for environmental policy outputs in the Member States (Jordan & Liefferink 2004; Knill 2001).”
- When the birds sing. A framework for analysing domestic factors behind policy convergence (2005, unknown): “For examples in the environmental field, see Knill and Lenschow (1998), Jordan et al. (2003), Jordan and Liefferink (2004); similarly, Duina (1997) points to the relevance of institutional ‘fit’ in social policy; Buller (2002) shows that the reformed European agricultural policy meets distinct…”
- Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs (2009, background): “This may also help to explain why reputed environmental leaders such as Germany or the Netherlands sometimes have severe problems implementing (other) international and EU obligations (cf. Börzel 2000; Knill and Lenschow 2000; Knill 2001; Jordan and Liefferink 2004).”