When the birds sing. A framework for analysing domestic factors behind policy convergence

By A. Lenschow, D. Liefferink, S. Veenman. 2005

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f3d9a74914508dd867e42dc253b8aa4e60d538d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Analysing the differential impact of the Bologna Process: Theoretical considerations on national conditions for international policy convergence (2008, background): “The significance of agency-related factors like domestic preferences and beliefs, especially of national governments, for explaining crossnational policy convergence has been highlighted in convergence studies as well as in research on Europeanization (see Holzinger and Knill 2007; Mastenbroek 2005)”
Policy diffusion and policy transfer (2009, background): “As such, there is a much greater interest in the preconditions for transfer in the recipient state and how national differences may alter the speed, scope and extent to which outside examples are incorporated into the domestic policy-making process (Lenschow et al. 2005).”
The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition or Learning? (2007, background): “…na l u se o nl y. ANRV316-SO33-21 ARI 24 May 2007 11:8 Gleditsch & Ward (2006) provide examples of both in their study of the diffusion of democracy in which they find that neighbors offer power resources that support (or hamper) transitions, from military support to social movement exemplars.”
Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: concepts, approaches and explanatory factors (2005, background): “This view, however, is not uncontested in the convergence literature (see, for instance, the contributions of Radaelli 2005 and Lenschow et al. 2005).”
GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO DO ITS JOB. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GOVERNANCE SHIFTS IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR (2011, background): “So although the direction of convergence is similar, the ‘national translation’ of the common policy template is based on domestic factors which strongly affect the calibration of the policy tools of the new governance mode (Lenschow et al. 2005).”
Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs (2009, background): “The set of seven independent variables fully covers the factors theoretically identified by Lenschow et al. (2005) and Börzel (2002) as well as a number of other key domestic factors suggested by the literature, notably environmental policy pressure, the openness to global (regulatory) competition…”
Explaining convergence of OECD welfare states: a conditional approach (2011, background): “…the convergence of societies, political science has moved towards a ‘middle-range’ approach, emphasizing the formerly implicit causal mechanisms and allowing a better operationalization of explanatory factors (Braumoeller, 2006; Drezner, 2005; Holzinger and Knill, 2005; Lenschow et al., 2005).”