Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation

By Thomas Fuchs, Hanne De Jaegher. 2009

754 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60eb1443b0c44411e7ee121d551740316c4a52e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Moving in and out of synchrony: A concept for a new intervention fostering empathy through interactional movement and dance (2012, background): “In the tradition of phenomenologial concepts (Stein, Husserl, Merleau-Ponty), various philosophical pproaches of embodied intersubjectivity have been conceptualzed and described (e.g., Fuchs, 2009; Fuchs & De Jaegher, 2009; ahavi, 2001).”
The extended body: a case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction (2012, neutral): “The enactive approach to cognitive science agrees with phenomenology on this point (Fuchs and De Jaegher 2009).”
Empirically Studying Participatory Sense-Making in Abstract Drawing with a Co-Creative Cognitive Agent (2016, methodology): “We employ the cognitive science theory of enaction [34] and its conceptual framework called participatory sense-making [15] to model and understand creative collaboration.”
Empathy and Direct Social Perception: A Phenomenological Proposal (2011, background): “... arguments and objections currently being launched against simulation (ST) based and theory-theory (TT) based approaches to mindreading have a phenomenological heritage in that they draw on ideas found in the work of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Stein, Gurwitsch, Scheler and Schutz ”
The phenomenology and development of social perspectives (2013, background): “…focuses on the expressive bodily behaviour, inter-bodily resonance, intentions as visible in action and the shared situational context in order to explain social understanding (Gallagher 2001, 2008; Zahavi 2001, 2008; De Jaegher and Di Paolo 2007; Fuchs and De Jaegher 2009; Stawarska 2009).”
Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis (2009, background): “(De Jaegher and Di Paolo 2007, p. 504) It is therefore likely that an integrative methodology that combines both dynamical and phenomenological insights would be mutually beneficial (see also Fuchs and De Jaegher 2009).”