The limits of visual resolution in natural scene viewing

By Lester C. Loschky, George W. McConkie, Jian Yang, Michael E. Miller. 2005

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60de00e3788e4dce9c42a83101b8eec5f166b3ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Tim J. Smith
2. Keith Rayner
3. J. Henderson
4. A. Hollingworth
5. Mary M. Hayhoe
6. B. Tatler
7. Kenneth Holmqvist
8. Holly Joseph

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Tim J. Smith
2. Keith Rayner
3. J. Henderson
4. Mary M. Hayhoe
5. Antonio Torralba
6. A. Hollingworth
7. B. Tatler
8. Kenneth Holmqvist

Citations in the corpus

• How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm (2009, background): “Loschky, McConkie, Yang, and Miller ( 2005 ) reported that fixation durations increased at the time of particular display changes associated with eye movements, also consistent with immediate process monitoring control, but participants executed manual responses along with their eye movements, and t”
• The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search (2009, background): “Finally, other recent studies have investigated the perceptual span via gaze-contingent multiresolution moving windows (Geisler, Perry, & Najemnik, 2006 ; Loschky, McConkie, Yang, & Miller, 2005 ).”