An experimental test of the ideal despotic distribution

By Ryan G Calsbeek, B. Sinervo. 2002

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60b898a2fb453358ad140f7ed75d2029e1f2ff4f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Sarah Wanless
2. W. Piper
3. J. Johnsson
4. Hanna Kokko
5. Dominic A. Edward
6. N. Dingemanse
7. Denis Réale

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Sarah Wanless
2. M. Harris
3. J. Johnsson
4. W. Piper
5. Hanna Kokko
6. B. Nolet
7. M. Frederiksen
8. Robert W. Furness

Citations in the corpus

• Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review (2011, background): “Under the ideal free model, fitness is equal for all individuals; the ideal dominance (or “ideal despotic”; e.g., Pulliam and Danielson 1991; Calsbeek and Sinervo 2002) model posits that dominant individuals exclude subordinates from high-quality habitat, which results in unequal fitness benefits.”
• Territory and group sizes in Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber): echoes of settlement and reproduction? (2005, background): “…Golden-winged Sunbirds (Nectarina reichenowi) (Gill and Wolf 1975) and the Hawaiian Honeycreeper (Vestiaria coccinea) (Carpenter and MacMillen 1976) as well as recently in side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) (Calsbeek and Sinervo 2002) and steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Keeley 2000).”
• Dominance rank influences female space use in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes : towards an ideal despotic distribution (2007, unknown): “…an ideal despotic distribution in wild populations is difficult, many empirical studies have demonstrated the effects of dominance on space use (e.g. white-footed mice, Peromyscus leucopus: Halama & Dueser 1994; red squirrels: Wauters et al. 2001; side-blotched lizards: Calsbeek & Sinervo 2002).”
• Habitat complexity reduces the growth of aggressive and dominant brown trout (Salmo trutta) relative to subordinates (2004, background): “Furthermore, birds (Burger 1974) and lizards (Calsbeek and Sinervo 2002) have larger territories when structural complexity is reduced.”
• Competition for breeding sites and site‐dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge (2004, background): “Evidence for site-dependent population regulation has been previously found for several bird species (e.g. imperial eagle Aquila adalberti Brehm: Ferrer & Donazar 1996; goshawk Accipiter gentilis L. Krüger & Lindström 2001), as well as for mammals (beaver Castor fibre L. Nolet & Rosell 1994; white-f”