A SEMANTICS FOR PSEUDO INCORPORATION

By Veneeta Dayal. 2003

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60b3b8fc1490645b2cb534f2505f75d338979edf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Legate
2. Ž. Bošković
3. Mark C. Baker

Citations in the corpus

• Morphological and Abstract Case (2008, background): “(Dayal 2003:(23)) On incorporation in Hindi, see Mohanan 1994:106–117 and Dayal 2003.”
• Ergative case and the transitive subject: a view from Nez Perce (2010, background): “12Terminology differs across previous accounts; most notably, the transitive clause type is labelled ‘ergative’ by Rude (1985 et seq.). Previous treatments of the clause type alternation include Aoki (1970, 1994); as a voice alternation, Rude (1985), Crook (1999); as a case alternation, Woolford (19”
• The Origin and Content of Expletives: Evidence from “Selection” (2009, unknown): “, Emonds 1970, Milsark 1974, Stowell 1978, Burzio 1986, among many others). Other subjects were repositioned downstairs into VP (Koopman & Sportiche 1991, among others), then slightly up into a functional projection VoiceP or vP (Kratzer 1996), but expletives stayed upstairs in Spec,TP.(3) This ‘‘hi”