The role of the ocean in the Madden–Julian Oscillation: Implications for MJO prediction

By S. Woolnough, F. Vitart, M. Balmaseda. 2007

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60a869db3ed384d27a0a23e19cf66f445ac1a5d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Hye-Mi Kim
2. Xianan Jiang
3. Duane Waliser
4. Á. Adames
5. J. M. Neena
6. Bin Wang
7. C. DeMott
8. June‐Yi Lee

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison of Dynamical and Statistical Predictions of Weekly Tropical Cyclone Activity in the Southern Hemisphere (2010, background): “of a high vertical resolution ocean mixed-layer model (Woolnough et al. 2007), which may further extend the FIG.”
• Potential applications of subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) predictions (2017, background): “The vertical resolution of the ocean component of forecasting systems, particularly in the top ocean layer, has also been documented to have a significant impact on the prediction of the MJO on S2S timescales through a stronger diurnal cycle of SST (Woolnough et al., 2007).”
• Simulation of the Madden– Julian Oscillation and its teleconnections in the ECMWF forecast system (2010, methodology): “Woolnough et al. (2007) have shown that coupling the atmospheric model to a high-verticalresolution ocean mixed-layer model can impact on the speed of the simulated MJO events through its impact on the SST diurnal cycle and intraseasonal variability.”
• Prediction of the Madden–Julian Oscillation: A Review (2018, methodology): “Using ECMWF hindcast experiments covering the TOGA COARE period, Woolnough et al. (2007) and Vitart et al. (2007) detected a 5-day improvement in RMM skill when the atmosphere is coupled to an ocean model, primarily from high vertical resolution (1m) in the near surface and high coupling frequency…”
• Fifty Years of Research on the Madden‐Julian Oscillation: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives (2020, background): “The importance of ocean feedback and varying SST to MJO prediction has been demonstrated (e.g., H. Seo et al., 2014; Woolnough et al., 2007), although the role of the ocean varies for individual MJO cases (X. Fu et al., 2015) and by model configuration (e.g., Crueger et al., 2013; W. Wang et al.,…”
• Predictability of the Madden–Julian Oscillation in the Intraseasonal Variability Hindcast Experiment (ISVHE)* (2014, background): “…(e.g., Maloney and Hartmann 2001; Liu et al. 2005; Vitart et al. 2007), coarse vertical resolution (Slingo et al. 1996; Inness et al. 2001), and lack of air–sea coupling (e.g., Hendon 2000; Fu et al. 2007; Woolnough et al. 2007) were some of the factors limiting the simulation of theMJO byGCMs.”
• A coupled data assimilation system for climate reanalysis (2016, background): “Sensitivity experiments have highlighted the importance of the frequency of the ocean–atmosphere coupling in the representation of the diurnal cycle and its rectification, especially the SST associated atmospheric reponse (Woolnough et al., 2007).”