Interference interactions, co‐existence and conservation of mammalian carnivores

By J. Linnell, O. Strand. 2000

420 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6077f7ea234464bc86c20156a6aedb236b7b56ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions (2012, background): “The spatial distribution of predators and prey is largely the result of trade-off decisions between energy intake, risk of predation and intra-guild competition (Palomares & Caro 1999, Linnell & Strand 2000, Lima 2002) causing spatial variation in reproduction and mortality rates.”
Occupancy patterns and niche partitioning within a diverse carnivore community exposed to anthropogenic pressures (2013, background): “…scales and fine (habitat) scales can reduce the frequency of potentially costly encounters between a subordinate and dominant competitor (Creel et al., 2001; Durant, 1998; Fedriani et al., 2000; Hayward and Slotow, 2009; Linnell and Strand, 2000; Mills and Biggs, 1993; Neale and Sacks, 2001).”
Temporal Partitioning of Activity in Large African Carnivores: Tests of Multiple Hypotheses (2009, background): “Time is one of the three critical dimensions of the ecological niche (Schoener 1974b) and temporal separation is one way members of a guild may differentiate their niche to facilitate coexistence (Fedriani et al. 1999; Linnell & Strand 2000; Albrecht & Gotelli 2001; Valeix et al. 2007).”
Dietary Niche Separation Between Sympatric Free-Ranging Domestic Dogs and Indian Foxes in Central India (2009, background): “Competition for resources is assumed to be the main driver of interference interactions in carnivores (Holt and Polis 1997) because carnivores with greater dietary overlap also display the most intense competition (Creel et al. 2001; Linnell and Strand 2000).”
Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. (2013, background): “…species can be affected by differential changes in density across each species in a community (e.g. Votier et al. 2004); this interference may influence population growth of small, subordinate species by inverse density-dependence, increasing their extinction probabilities (Linnell & Strand 2000).”
Interference competition between gray wolves and coyotes in Yellowstone National Park (2009, background): “Less emphasized are studies on the influence of top predators on other predator populations (Linnell and Strand 2000), even though these interactions may be important (Rosenzweig 1966; Case and Gilpin 1974).”
Predation or scavenging? Prey body condition influences decision‐making in a facultative predator, the wolverine (2016, background): “However, top predators can also pose a risk for subordinate scavengers (Krofel et al. 2012, Elbroch et al. 2015) or increase competition (Linnell and Strand 2000, Berger and Gese 2007).”
Spatiotemporal patterns of lion space use in a human-dominated landscape (2015, background): “Behavioural responses to predation risk shown by herbivores and mesocarnivores suggest temporal partitioning of habitats and resources can be a strategy to reduce predation risk (Durant, 1998; Harrington et al., 2009; Kronfeld-Schor & Dayan, 2003; Linnell & Strand, 2000; Valeix et al., 2009).”
Interactions between cougars (Puma concolor) and gray wolves (Canis lupus) in Banff National Park, Alberta (2007, background): “Interactions between large carnivore populations can be of critical relevance to community structure, conservation biology, and wildlife management (Creel & Creel, 1996; Durant, 1998; Linnell & Strand, 2000).”
Spatial and Temporal Structure of a Mesocarnivore Guild in Midwestern North America (2015, background): “Similarly, gray foxes and red foxes reduce competitiv asymmetry with coyotes by adapting their behavior to the fluctuating risks associated with coyotes (Linnell and Strand 2000).”
Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition (2009, background): “…wild carnivores suggests that intraguild competition affects the persistence and abundance of carnivore populations and thus can have dramatic consequences for the structure of carnivore communities (Karanth & Sunquist, 2000; Linnell & Strand, 2000; Creel, Spong & Creel, 2001; Caro & Stoner, 2003).”