The rise of "the rest"
By A. Amsden. 2001
691 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6068003eaa3f9f9385f2c18d4aa88123f5813e03
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anthropology
- Richard R. Nelson
- Mariana Mazzucato
- I. Kvangraven
- Jack D. Glen
- Ha-Joon Chang
- C. Penna
- S. M. Shafaeddin
- Engelbert Stockhammer
In Economics and Econometrics
- Rajneesh Narula
- John H. Dunning
- Mariana Mazzucato
- David J. Teece
- Matt Andrews
- Richard R. Nelson
- Olga Petricevic
- Eva Paus
Citations in the corpus
- Trade Liberalization And Economic Reform In Developing Countries: Structural Change Or De-Industrialization? (2005, background): “On the one hand, investment is the main factor in growth of exports, supply capacity and upgrading ( Amsden 2001, Chapters 4 and 5). On the other hand, exports can have positive effects on investment through their “income effects” and “supply effects” and “vent for surplus effects”.”
- Capital account liberalization, free long-term capital flows, financial crises and economic development (2003, neutral): “On the basis of case studies of several late industrialising economies, Amsden (2001) suggests that only those countries have been successful in the industrialisation process which were able to develop institutional mechanisms for ensuring autonomous state action in the economy.”
- The Microfinance Illusion (2009, positive): “Experience from countries such as Italy after 1945 (Weiss, 1988), South Korea and Taiwan from the 1970s onwards (Wade, 1990; Chang, 1993) and most recently China since the early 1980s (Naughton, 1995) shows how crucially important it is to invest in small enterprise units (including in agriculture) ”
- Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies (2002, background): “But in cases such as semiconductors in Korea and Taiwan, the institutional framework can be seen to have ushered the newly created industry through four clear phases, of preparation (laying the groundwork in terms of basic skills), seeding (leveraging the targeted technology), propagation (diffusion”
- Enhancing the Role of Universities in Building National Innovative Capacity in Asia: The Case of Taiwan (2007, neutral): “For the latecomer countries whose primary strategic goal is to catch up, innovation means ‘‘new-to-the-country’’ innovation, which involves the management of accelerated diffusion of technologies from advanced to catchup countries (Amsden, 2001; Hobday, 1994; Kim, 1997; Mathews, 2001).”
- A comparative political economy of diversified business groups, or how states organize big business (2009, background): “Other economic approaches develop arguments based on economies of scope where business groups develop generic expertise that can be profitably applied in multiple sectors (Amsden, 2001).”
- The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise (2019, background): “1Countries outside of the North Atlantic were classified as ‘‘the rest’’ and included China, India, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Turkey (Amsden, 2001:1).”
- Industrial policy for sustainable human development in the post-Covid19 era (2020, neutral): “Other groups of countries surely have relevant experiences of industrial policy and government intervention governing structural change, shaped by the variety of their capitalisms, government systems and investment capacities (Amsden, 2001).”
- Multinational Enterprises, Development and Globalization: Some Clarifications and a Research Agenda (2010, background): “10 For a discussion of these policies, see Amsden (2001) and Lall (1996).”
- Corporate Profitability and the Dynamics of Competition in Emerging Markets: A Time Series Analysis (2003, positive): “Indeed, Amsden (2001) suggests that it is only those countries which succeeded in developing institutions which would allow governments to impose and monitor performance requirements that were successful in industrial development.”