Simple versus optimal mechanisms
By Jason D. Hartline, Tim Roughgarden. SeCO Workshops, 2009
330 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6061c86735465ff0c1797f1ac95fd8081f9fa7ad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Robert D. Kleinberg
- S. Matthew Weinberg
- Pablo D. Azar
- Tim Roughgarden
- Richard J. Cole
- Jason D. Hartline
- Balasubramanian Sivan
- David L. Malec
In Marketing
- Pablo D. Azar
- S. Matthew Weinberg
- Robert D. Kleinberg
- Tim Roughgarden
- Richard J. Cole
- Jason D. Hartline
- Balasubramanian Sivan
- David L. Malec
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- Revenue maximization with a single sample (2010, background): “Approximation in the revenue benchmark framework discussed in the introduction is strictly stronger than the simultaneous approximation goal pursued in the present paper; this fact is made explicit in [10] and is pursued further in [4, 11, 12].”
- The sample complexity of revenue maximization (2014, background): “[6, 14]) or even, when there is no bidder with a unique valuation distribution, with no dependence on the valuation distributions [7, 8, 18].”
- Prophet Inequalities with Limited Information (2013, methodology): “In [14], the authors first remove every bidder who does not meet their reserve, and then run the welfare maximizing mechanism.”
- Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing (2010, background): “Formally, a Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanismVp with reserve pricesp serves the setS of agents, with vi ≥ pi for all i ∈ S, that maximizes ∑ i∈S vi. Hartline and Roughgarden [13] show that in several single-parameter settings the VCG mechanism with monopoly reserve prices gives a constant factor”