The emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom (2003).

By Jonathan Haidt. 2003

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/604580ee01771acf4bba7a4bc2a4261d65d0e51f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

13 Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going (2008, unknown): “Similarly, Haidt’s ( 2001 ) intuitionist model relegates reason largely, though not entirely (Haidt, 2003 , 2004 ), to post hoc rationalizing.”
Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. (2005, background): “As in any domain of social psychology, the challenge is in specifying how these various themes relate to one another and in delineating the boundaries of what they do and do not tell us about human behavior in a given domain (cf. Haidt, 2003; Pizarro & Bloom, 2003).”
Leader Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: Strategies for Sensemaking (2012, background): “…that both positive and negative emotions can limit one’s ability to recognize and respond appropriately to ethical events (Cohen 2010; Connelly et al. 2004; Gaudine and Thorne 2001; Haidt 2003 Lerner et al. 2004; Preston et al. 2007) lending further support for consideration at the discrete level.”
Deciding versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate (2007, methodology): “1 We use the term “emotionalists” for clarity, although Haidt typically calls his approach “social intuitionist” (e.g., Haidt, 2001, 2003), but these intuitions are without fail described as affect-laden.”
Implicit self-concept and moral action (2009, background): “Reference to implicit processes in moral psychology is not unprecedented (Haidt, 2001, 2003; Narvaez, Lapsley, Hagele, & Lasky, 2006).”
The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values (2014, unknown): “…2012; Greene & Haidt, 2002; Greene, Morelli, Lowenberg, Nystrom, & Cohen, 2008; Greene, Nystrom, Engell, Darley, & Cohen, 2004; Greene, Sommerville, Nystrom, Darley, & Cohen, 2001; Haidt, 2001, 2003, 2007, 2012; Haidt & Kesebir, 2010; Paxton & Greene, 2010; Pizarro & Bloom, 2003; Saunders, 2013).”