Hysteretic behavior of precast segmental bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy bars

By H. Roh, Andrei M. Reinhorn. 2010

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6016e7bbef9a4611b051de42ad1bbefdf50af767

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. D. Palermo
2. S. Foo
3. A. Abdulridha
4. Reginald DesRoches
5. Songye Zhu
6. C. Qiu
7. F. Vecchio
8. A. Saritas

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. D. Palermo
2. C. Qiu
3. O. Ozbulut
4. Stefan Hurlebaus
5. Songye Zhu
6. S. Foo
7. A. Abdulridha
8. Reginald DesRoches

Citations in the corpus

• Behavior and modeling of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete beams (2013, methodology): “Numerical modeling has also been employed to investigate the effect of SMAs on the behavior of precast segmental bridge piers [22] and overstrength and ductility of concrete buildings [23].”
• Shake table test and numerical study of self‐centering steel frame with SMA braces (2017, background): “A variety of seismic-resisting self-centering devices or structural members have been developed based on these favorable features of superelastic SMAs [10–26], including SMA base isolators for elevated highway bridges and frames [11, 21], SMA dampers [12], SMA restrainers for bridge retrofitting [14”
• Seismic Response Control Using Shape Memory Alloys: A Review (2011, background): “There have been several reviews of the literature on civil engineering applications of SMAs, including Saadat et al. (2002); DesRoches and Smith (2004); Janke et al.”