Seismic Response Control Using Shape Memory Alloys: A Review

404 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Iron-based shape memory alloys for civil engineering structures: An overview (2014, background): “, Ni–Ti or Cu-based alloys, can be found elsewhere [5,47,76–86].”
Iron-based shape memory alloy strips for strengthening RC members: Material behavior and characterization (2018, background): “45 Although the expensive NiTi-based alloys are the most widely used SMAs [1], low-cost copper46 based shape memory alloys (Cu-SMAs) and Fe-SMAs are gaining ground [2, 20-22].”
Reconciling viability and cost-effective shape memory alloy options – A review of copper and iron based shape memory metallic systems (2016, background): “The As (Austenite start) is the beginning of the reverse reaction that is the formation of austenite and Af (Austenite finish) marks the end of the reverse reaction that is complete formation of austenite [18].”
Buckling-induced smart applications: recent advances and trends (2015, background): “Isolator [20, 69] [63, 65, 70, 134] [21] [21] [155]”
Shake table test and numerical study of self‐centering steel frame with SMA braces (2017, background): “[39] offered comprehensive reviews of the versatile applications of SMAs in civil engineering.”