Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex

By T. Meyer, Carl Olson. 2011

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Theory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem (2013, positive): “Error neurons are similarly distributed throughout the cortex and respond to specific stimulus features (Meyer and Olson, 2011; den Ouden et al., 2012), rather than, for example, a single ‘‘error region’’ signaling the overall amount of error or degree to which the observed stimulus is unpredicted (”
Predictive Processing: A Canonical Cortical Computation (2018, unknown): “This is indeed the case when stimuli become predictable either as the result of a learned association with a preceding stimulus (Egner et al., 2010; Meyer and Olson, 2011), or after frequent presentation of the same stimulus, in which case the suppression is often described as sensory adaptation (Ul”
How Do Expectations Shape Perception? (2018, methodology): “Such studies showed for instance that expectation suppression in macaque IT was associated with decreased decoding performance [66]; that BOLD responses in posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) to expected words were weaker and contained less information, as quantified by representational simila”
How Prediction Errors Shape Perception, Attention, and Motivation (2012, background): “…a transitional surprise effect in inferotemporal cortex, the terminus of the ventral stream, where object-selective neurons exhibited a much stronger response to unpredicted than predicted images after image transitions were learned by associative pairing (Meyer and Olson, 2011, Figure 1B).”
The Visual System's Internal Model of the World (2015, background): “Recently, neurophysiological results have found that neurons in IT experienced more significant suppression when an incoming event is predicted than when such event is not predicted [94], [95].”
Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. (2012, unknown): “Furthermore, neurons in monkey inferotemporal cortex respond significantly less to a predicted sequence of natural images, compared to an unpredicted sequence (Meyer and Olson, 2011).”
Concurrent Repetition Enhancement and Suppression Responses in Extrastriate Visual Cortex (2012, background): “Cerebral Cortex September 2013, V 23 N 9 2241”
Less Is More: Expectation Sharpens Representations in the Primary Visual Cortex (2012, unknown): “This is in line with recent neurophysiological studies in monkeys and humans, highlighting that valid expectations lead to a reduction in spiking activity (Meyer and Olson, 2011) as well as gamma-band oscillatory activity (Todorovic et al., 2011).”
Neural networks and neuroscience-inspired computer vision. (2014, background): “showed that responses of inferotemporal neurons to particular stimuli could be nearly completely suppressed if the animal learned to expect their appearance in a particular ordered sequence; these same stimuli evoked strong responses when seen out of the learned order [90].”
Repetition Suppression and Expectation Suppression Are Dissociable in Time in Early Auditory Evoked Fields (2012, background): “Although this chicken-or-egg problem seems hard to resolve, a recent study (Meyer and Olson, 2011) suggests that ES may be a cause of, rather than consequence of, attentional capture.”
A Hierarchy of Responses to Auditory Regularities in the Macaque Brain (2014, unknown): “In humans, many brain areas show a reduced activation to predictable sequences and an increased response to unexpected stimuli, thought to reflect a prediction error (Friston, 2005; Meyer and Olson, 2011; Wacongne et al., 2011, 2012; Sanmiguel et al., 2013).”