Individual versus group behavior and the role of the decision making procedure in gift-exchange experiments

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy (2007, background): “Kocher and Sutter (2006) demonstrated that groups are less altruistic in dictator games.”
Group polarization in the team dictator game reconsidered (2009, unknown): “In fact, Kocher and Sutter (2007) have found first moverteams in a gift-exchange game to act differently, depending upon whether team members are requested to reach a decision via face-to-face communication or via voting electronically on different proposals.”
The hidden advantage of delegation: pareto-improvements in a gift-exchange game (2012, background): “In recent years, Abeler et al. (2006) study the interaction of different payment modes with reciprocity; Kocher and Sutter (2007) analyze how groups behave in the gift exchange game and the role of communication; Charness et al. (2004) find that the degree of gift exchange is surprisingly sensitive…”