Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming

By R. Sherry, Xuhui Zhou, S. Gu, J. Arnone, D. Schimel, P. Verburg, L. Wallace, Yiqi Luo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007

650 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5fe10738c9811e01f6f0d8ef91b2e606da12911f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Spatial and interspecific variability in phenological responses to warming temperatures (2009, background): “…and populations’ phenological changes is likely due to a combination of factors, including changes in temperature and other climatic variables (Sherry et al., 2007), population sizes (Tryjanowski and Sparks, 2001; Miller-Rushing et al., 2008a,b), genetic differences, phenotypic plasticity,…”
Beyond gradual warming: extreme weather events alter flower phenology of European grassland and heath species (2009, background): “, 2006), and a double precipitation treatment without changes in the rainfall timing had no significant effect on flowering phenology in a perennial grassland in Oklahoma (Sherry et al., 2007).”
Temperature effects on forest herbs assessed by warming and transplant experiments along a latitudinal gradient (2011, background): “Plant responses to rising temperatures vary between species with different phenologies (Sherry et al., 2007; Kudo et al., 2008; De Frenne et al., 2009, 2011b) and life forms (Walker et al.”
Response of individual components of reproductive phenology to growing season length in a monocarpic herb (2011, background): “…and (c) cumulative fitness (lsmeans) for populations of Campanulastrum americanum collected from high (H1, H2) and low (L1, L2) elevations and reciprocally transplanted to common gardens at high- and low-elevation sites. et al. 2004; Stinson 2004; Sherry et al. 2007; Hovenden et al. 2008).”
Regeneration: an overlooked aspect of trait‐based plant community assembly models (2016, background): “…(‘flowering time shifts’, sensu Wolkovich et al. 2013) rather than driving species turnover in communities based on mean trait values (a subject currently being addressed by studies on phenology and climate change, Sherry et al. 2007; Craine, Wolkovich & Towne 2012b; Wolkovich, Cook & Davies 2014).”
Emergence of a mid‐season period of low floral resources in a montane meadow ecosystem associated with climate change (2011, background): “Climate is a powerful driver of phenology (Gordo & Sanz 2010) and the effects of climate change on phenology have become a major focus of research (Sherry et al. 2007; Post & Forchhammer 2008; Both et al. 2009; Saino et al. 2009).”
Intraseasonal climate and habitat‐specific variability controls the flowering phenology of high alpine plant species (2010, background): “…within the same type of habitat (Körner 2003): Species may be triggered by different environmental factors (Defila & Clot 2001), respond to changes in the same factor but at dif- ferent rates (Galen & Stanton 1995; Post et al. 2008) or even in opposite directions (Kudo 1992; Sherry et al. 2007).”
The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective (2011, neutral): “…has received increasing attention in recent decades, because it is a major indicator of climate change (Fitter and Fitter 2002; Cleland et al. 2007; Sherry et al. 2007), promoting the development of new, geographically extensive databases (Morisette et al. 2009), in addition to previously…”
Integrating plant–soil interactions into global carbon cycle models (2009, background): “…interactions directly as a result of atmospheric warming, alterations in precipitation patterns (IPCC 2001) and lengthening of plant growing seasons (Sherry et al. 2007) and indirectly as a result of longer-term changes in the distribution, productivity and composition of vegetation (Heimann &…”
Drought and Its Consequences to Plants – From Individual to Ecosystem (2013, background): “The following are the most detectable features of global warming: 1) its influence on the per‐ ception of plants regarding the seasons (the advance of biological spring and the delay in biological winter have been observed and such changes have a direct effect on the reproduc‐ tive events of floweri”
Flowering phenology and height growth pattern are associated with maximum plant height, relative growth rate and stem tissue mass density in herbaceous grassland species (2011, background): “Some previous studies have defined the times when the first individual started and the last individual ended flowering as flowering onset and offset time respectively (e.g. Sherry et al. 2007; Hovenden et al. 2008).”
Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. (2007, background): “Sherry et al. [ 64 ] found that warming accelerated development in early-season species but delayed development in later-active species, resulting in an open phenological niche that could facilitate future invasions by non-native species.”
Impact of climate change on plant phenology in Mediterranean ecosystems (2010, background): “Differential responses to climate among plant species may alter community composition by disrupting interactions and survival under a climate change scenario (Fitter & Fitter, 2002; Lloret et al., 2004; Sherry et al., 2007; Willis et al., 2008).”
Functional and Phylogenetic Approaches to Forecasting Species' Responses to Climate Change (2012, background): “Among both European butterflies and moths since 1980 (Altermatt 2010) and North American prairie flowers in a warming experiment (Sherry et al. 2007), early-season flyers and bloomers emerge earlier, whereas late-season flyers and bloomers emerge later in response to warming.”
Complex responses to climate drivers in onset of spring flowering across a semi‐arid elevation gradient (2010, background): “Consistent with other studies of climate drivers of phenological events (Peñuelas et al. 2004; Cleland et al. 2006; Sherry et al. 2007), responses in this study were highly species-specific.”
Climate change and plant regeneration from seed (2011, background): “…al., 2009; Hoffman et al., 2010) and Arctic tundra (Molau & Shaver, 1997), but warming effects on fruit phenology for prairie plants depended on the start of r 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Global Change Biology, 17, 2145–2161 flowering in relation to the peak of summer heat (Sherry et al., 2007).”