Interrogating open issues in cancer precision medicine with patient-derived xenografts

By A. Byrne, D. Alférez, F. Amant, D. Annibali, J. Arribas, A. Biankin, A. Bruna, E. Budinská, Carlos Caldas, D. Chang and 32 more. Nature Reviews. Cancer, 2017

601 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have emerged as an important platform to elucidate new treatments and biomarkers in oncology. PDX models are used to address clinically relevant questions, including the contribution of tumour heterogeneity to therapeutic responsiveness, the patterns of cancer evolutionary dynamics during tumour progression and under drug pressure, and the mechanisms of resistance to treatment. The ability of PDX models to predict clinical outcomes is being improved through mouse humanization strategies and the implementation of co-clinical trials, within which patients and PDXs reciprocally inform therapeutic decisions. This Opinion article discusses aspects of PDX modelling that are relevant to these questions and highlights the merits of shared PDX resources to advance cancer medicine from the perspective of EurOPDX, an international initiative devoted to PDX-based research.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cancer Research, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5faeead36bb38966f65c90f9eda3176bfd9c7ac8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Zena Werb

In Cancer Research

  1. Zena Werb
  2. Pengfei Lu
  3. Valerie M. Weaver

In Oncology

  1. Hugo Gonzalez
  2. Zena Werb
  3. C. Hagerling
  4. Pengfei Lu
  5. M. Egeblad
  6. Raghu Kalluri
  7. Valerie M. Weaver

Citations in the corpus