Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals in HYPO
By Kevin D. Ashley. 1991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Conor Nugent
- Dónal Doyle
- Padraig Cunningham
- Michael A. Redmond
- Mark T. Keane
- Eoin M. Kenny
- Frode Sørmo
- Or Biran
Citations in the corpus
- Computing , Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology A data-driven software tool for enabling cooperative information sharing among police departments (2002, background): “While research prototypes have addressed legal issues, such as trade secrets law (Ashley, 1991) criminal sentencing by judges (Bain, 1986) and determining of sanctions for government employee negligence (Shiu, 1999), to the best of authors’ knowledge CBR has not been used for any law enforcement…”
- Gaining insight through case-based explanation (2009, methodology): “Techniques for emphasising relevant features based on a classification are also used in the HYPO ( Ashley 1987, 1991 ) and CATO (Ashley and Aleven 1997)”
- Argumentation mining (2011, background): “In case-based reasoning systems, such as [33], [34], [46], [47], [48] or [49], where expertise is embodied in a library of past cases and the current problem is matched”
- Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning (2005, unknown): “Such explanations are known as precedent-based explanations and have long been a feature of case-based models of legal argumentation (e.g., Ashley, 1991; Branting, 1991; Rissland & Skalak, 1991).”