The cognitive neuropsychology of delusions

By Robyn Langdon, Max Coltheart. 2000

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5efa4173564752ce0b7b488015618536c112d8e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Monothematic Delusions: Towards a Two-Factor Account (2001, background): “For further discussion, see Langdon and Coltheart, 2000 .”
The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information (2010, background): “…of ADHD (Soo & Bailey, 2006), the autistic spectrum (Bruinsma, Koegel, & Koegel, 2004) and schizophrenia (Bentall, 1994; Gold & Thaker, 2002; Langdon & Coltheart, 2000; Suslow, Schonauer, & Arolt, 2001), as well as investigations of attentional deterioration in ageing populations (Lawton,…”
Anosognosia and the Two-factor Theory of Delusions (2005, background): “This account could be correct whether or not the Capgras patient’s experience of the spouse differs 3 See Davies and Coltheart, 2000; Langdon and Coltheart, 2000; Davies, Coltheart, Langdon and Breen, 2001.”
The 33rd Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture Cognitive neuropsychiatry and delusional belief (2007, background): “Mood could do just the same as desire, and so could attributional style; Langdon and Coltheart (2000) add the suggestion that the folk are intrinsically biased towards folk-psychological hypotheses for explaining what has happened to them—that is, biased for personal-level explanations (such as “My…”
In Defence of the Doxastic Conception of Delusions (2005, background): “…Maher, 1999), many theorists have argued that unusual experiences play an important role in triggering monothematic delusions (Ellis and Young, 1990; Langdon and Coltheart, 2000; Davies, Coltheart, Langdon 4 Although we think that top-down accounts of delusions are coherent, we do not think that…”