Monothematic Delusions: Towards a Two-Factor Account

By M. Davies, M. Coltheart, Robyn Langdon, Nora Breen. 2001

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f78332775264fe3e47be8f1d2872bf7e4a136a45

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Elisabeth Pacherie
2. Tim Bayne
3. J. Pierre
4. Shaun Gallagher

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Elisabeth Pacherie
2. J. Pierre

In Philosophy

1. Elisabeth Pacherie
2. Tim Bayne

Citations in the corpus

• The 33rd Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture Cognitive neuropsychiatry and delusional belief (2007, unknown): “Davies, Coltheart, Langdon, and Breen ( 2001 , pp.”
• In Defence of the Doxastic Conception of Delusions (2005, background): “As we mentioned earlier, there a plausible experiential account of the genesis of a number of delusions (see section 2.1; for reviews see Langdon and Coltheart, 2000; Davies et al., 2001).”
• Mistrust and misinformation: A two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories (2020, background): “A “two-factor model” of delusional thinking has been proposed to explain 1) why an implausible idea comes to mind in the first place and 2) why the belief is subsequently adopted rather than rejected (Davies et al., 2001; Langdon, 2011).”