The sharing economy: : A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?

By Chris J. Martin. 2016

1,255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ec760d326ffb4ae5134a624bc1e2c35db1a2b62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Is sharing the solution? Exploring public acceptability of the sharing economy (2018, background): “With the dominant conceptualisation of the sharing economy framed almost entirely in terms of economic benefits, it is currently unlikely to achieve the desired environmental and social benefits promised (Martin, 2016).”
Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research (2016, background): “The sharing economy concept entered wide public discourse between 2011 and 2012 with the two Silicon Valley success stories of Airbnb and Uber (Martin, 2016).”
Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation (2017, neutral): “However, the sharing economy has also caused considerable controversy, for example related to rising rents for local residents because of accommodation sharing (Martin, 2016; Frenken et al, 2015).”
A Systematic Literature Review. Relationships between the Sharing Economy, Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals (2020, background): “How can we promote sustainable development? The sharing economy is usually related to sustainability, and it is framed as: (a) an economic opportunity, (b) a more sustainable form of consumption and (c) a pathway to an equitable and sustainable economy [3].”
What makes a sustainable business model successful? : An empirical comparison of two peer-to-peer goods-sharing platforms (2018, neutral): “According to Martin (2016), it is possible to identify four main sectors within the sharing economy: ‘ accommodation sharing platforms ’ (e.g. Airbnb, Couchsur ﬁ ng); ‘ car and ride sharing platforms ’ (e.g. Zipcar, Uber); ‘ peer-to-peer employment markets ’ (e.g. TaskRabbit, PeoplePerHour) and ‘…”
Adding evidence to the debate: Quantifying Airbnb's disruptive impact on ten key hotel markets (2019, background): “including Airbnb, is indeed a disruptive innovation that could transform established sociotechnical and -economic structures, or simply a reinforcement of the prevailing neoliberal economic paradigm (Martin, 2016).”
Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework (2018, background): “This is while a few other scholars claim that this is not always the case, and a paradoxical potential exists in this regard [40], called the sustainability paradox or the paradox of sustainable development, which refers to the increase in consumption due to societal and economic factors, while ther”
The battle of the buzzwords: A comparative review of the circular economy and the sharing economy concepts (2021, background): “…Received 14 February 2020; Received in revised form 22 October 2020; Accepted 27 October 2020 Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 38 (2021) 1–21 2 exaggerated neoclassical and neoliberal interpretations (Martin, 2016; Martins, 2016; Murillo et al., 2017).”
Airbnb, buy-to-let investment and tourism-driven displacement: A case study in Lisbon (2019, background): “On the one hand, as Martin (2016) suggests, Airbnb is reinforcing the neoliberal paradigm that in this case involves further insecurity of tenancy.”
Upsides and downsides of the sharing economy: Collaborative consumption business models' stakeholder value impacts and their relationship to context (2017, background): “…and uncertainty surrounding the implications of increasingly influential sharing economy business models (Acquier et al., 2016; Mair and Reischauer, 2016; Martin, 2016) and specifically how these business models create or destroy value for their diverse stakeholders in emerging economies.”