Thermal relics in hidden sectors

By Jonathan L. Feng, H. Tu, Hai-Bo Yu. 2008

287 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Dark matter may be hidden, with no standard model gauge interactions. At the same time, in WIMPless models (WIMP: weakly interacting massive particles) with hidden matter masses proportional to hidden gauge couplings squared, the hidden dark matter’s thermal relic density may naturally be in the right range, preserving the key quantitative virtue of WIMPs. We consider this possibility in detail. We first determine model-independent constraints on hidden sectors from big bang nucleosynthesis and the cosmic microwave background. Contrary to conventional wisdom, large hidden sectors are easily accommodated. A flavour-free version of the standard model is allowed if the hidden sector is just 30% colder than the observable sector after reheating. Alternatively, if the hidden sector contains a one-generation version of the standard model with characteristic mass scale below 1 MeV, even identical reheating temperatures are allowed. We then analyse hidden sector freeze-out in detail for a concrete model, solving the Boltzmann equation numerically and explaining the results from both observable and hidden sector points of view. We find that WIMPless dark matter does indeed obtain the correct relic density for masses in the range . The upper bound results from the requirement of perturbativity, and the lower bound assumes that the observable and hidden sectors reheat to the same temperature, and is raised to the MeV scale if the hidden sector is ten times colder. WIMPless dark matter therefore generalizes the WIMP paradigm to the largest mass range possible for viable thermal relics and provides a unified framework for exploring dark matter signals across nine orders of magnitude in dark matter mass.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e4599e8cb746b5def18c251eb419f0766b7a0ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. A. Peter
  2. Matthew R. Buckley
  3. Jonathan L. Feng
  4. Tongyan Lin
  5. N. Bernal
  6. Hai-Bo Yu
  7. M. Kaplinghat
  8. T. Tait

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. A. Peter
  2. Jonathan L. Feng
  3. Matthew R. Buckley
  4. M. Kaplinghat
  5. Tongyan Lin
  6. T. Hambye
  7. Hai-Bo Yu
  8. JiJi Fan

Citations in the corpus