A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States

By S. Barnes. First Monday, 2006

1,386 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Teenagers will freely give up personal information to join social networks on the Internet. Afterwards, they are surprised when their parents read their journals. Communities are outraged by the personal information posted by young people online and colleges keep track of student activities on and off campus. The posting of personal information by teens and students has consequences. This article will discuss the uproar over privacy issues in social networks by describing a privacy paradox; private versus public space; and, social networking privacy issues. It will finally discuss proposed privacy solutions and steps that can be taken to help resolve the privacy paradox.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e30227914559ce088a750885761adbb7d2edbbf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Education

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Over-exposed?: privacy patterns and considerations in online and mobile photo sharing (2007, background): “Consequently, many of the privacy and identity issues that arise in social network sites such as Facebook [2,24] and MySpace [4,24], exist in ZoneTag and Flickr as well.”
Student-Teacher Interaction on Facebook: What Students Find Appropriate (2011, background): “It is an issue for the entire university, including campus police, student affairs, and the administration (see Barnes, 2006; Fleming, 2008; Lindenberger, 2006; Lipka, 2007; Mitrano, 2006; Timm & Duven, 2008). At the institutional level, Mitrano (2006) advised developing a policy and communicating t”
Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon (2017, background): “Barnes (2006) uses the term privacy paradox in reference to the privacy behaviour of young people in Social Networking Sites (SNSs).”
Exploring the Security of Information Sharing on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Perceived Control of Information (2014, background): “Prior research has reported SNS users’ concerns about their privacy and security, which is a signal that users need better protections for their information shared on SNS (Barnes 2006).”
Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks (2009, background): “In turn, school projects can stimulate students’ interest – thus motivating them to seek more information, opportunities, and like-minded people with whom to learn on their own terms (Barron 2006).”
Secrets and Likes: The Drive for Privacy and the Difficulty of Achieving It in the Digital Age (2020, background): “…version of the dichotomy: a gap between generic attitudes (typically expressing an overall desire for or concern over privacy) and actual behaviors (often interpreted as privacy-neglecting), such as social media sharing (Barnes, 2006) or disclosure choices in experiments (Spiekermann et al., 2001).”
Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age (2014, background): “Therefore, this variable will determine the acceptance success rate of new technologies such as e-commerce (Chen & Barnes, 2007; Goles, Lee, Rao, & Warren, 2009; Yang, Chandlrees, Lin, & Chao, 2009). Gefen, Karahanna, and Straub (2003) obtain a behavioral model that combines the antecedents based on”
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Privacy concerns in chatbot interactions (neutral): “While, as stated in the “ privacy paradox ” , perceived privacy risks do not automatically translate into not disclosing information online [4, 14], several scholars found privacy concerns and information disclosure to be related [5].”
Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube (2007, background): “determine public/private boundaries, rather than incorporating both lenses (Barnes, 2006; Sandvig, 2006) or 2) do not consider how contexts other than the one they are analyzing shed light on public/private dimensions (Al-Saggaf, 2006).”
Signals in Social Supernets (2007, background): “People give away personal identification and publish intimate and revealing stories about themselves (Barnes, 2006; Gross, Acquisti, & Heinz III, 2005).”
The 'Privacy Paradox' in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure1 (2014, background): “That is why the notion of a ‘privacy paradox’ (Barnes, 2006) was invented.”
Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook (2010, background): “This disparity, termed the "privacy paradox," [5] is often attributed to lack of comprehension, awareness, or concern for privacy within the context of the”