Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness

By C. Rahbek, G. Graves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001

866 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The search for a common cause of species richness gradients has spawned more than 100 explanatory hypotheses in just the past two decades. Despite recent conceptual advances, further refinement of the most plausible models has been stifled by the difficulty of compiling high-resolution databases at continental scales. We used a database of the geographic ranges of 2,869 species of birds breeding in South America (nearly a third of the world's living avian species) to explore the influence of climate, quadrat area, ecosystem diversity, and topography on species richness gradients at 10 spatial scales (quadrat area, ≈12,300 to ≈1,225,000 km2). Topography, precipitation, topography × latitude, ecosystem diversity, and cloud cover emerged as the most important predictors of regional variability of species richness in regression models incorporating 16 independent variables, although ranking of variables depended on spatial scale. Direct measures of ambient energy such as mean and maximum temperature were of ancillary importance. Species richness values for 1° × 1° latitude-longitude quadrats in the Andes (peaking at 845 species) were ≈30–250% greater than those recorded at equivalent latitudes in the central Amazon basin. These findings reflect the extraordinary abundance of species associated with humid montane regions at equatorial latitudes and the importance of orography in avian speciation. In a broader context, our data reinforce the hypothesis that terrestrial species richness from the equator to the poles is ultimately governed by a synergism between climate and coarse-scale topographic heterogeneity.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e24c5bae71e633c5dc3395b394772f436bd7379

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

  1. Miguel B. Araújo
  2. Antoine Guisan
  3. Jorge M. Lobo
  4. C. Rahbek
  5. Wilfried Thuiller
  6. A. Townsend Peterson
  7. Jens‐Christian Svenning
  8. J. Diniz-Filho

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. Miguel B. Araújo
  2. Walter Jetz
  3. Hong Qian
  4. Antoine Guisan
  5. Wilfried Thuiller
  6. H. Kreft
  7. A. Baselga
  8. Jorge M. Lobo

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Miguel B. Araújo
  2. Antoine Guisan
  3. C. Rahbek
  4. Wilfried Thuiller
  5. Jorge M. Lobo
  6. Jens‐Christian Svenning
  7. J. Diniz-Filho
  8. Walter Jetz

Citations in the corpus