Are richness patterns of common and rare species equally well explained by environmental variables

By J. Lennon, Colin M. Beale, C. Reid, M. Kent, R. Pakeman. 2011

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/352d39ed0011f1b152b63198b333f55772d143b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Å. Lindström
2. Henrik G. Smith
3. David B. Lindenmayer
4. V. Devictor
5. Oscar Gordo

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Å. Lindström
2. J. Wood
3. Henrik G. Smith
4. David B. Lindenmayer
5. V. Devictor
6. Oscar Gordo

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Å. Lindström
2. J. Wood
3. Henrik G. Smith
4. David B. Lindenmayer
5. S. Banks
6. V. Devictor
7. Ross Goldingay

Citations in the corpus

• How to make a common species rare: A case against conservation complacency (2011, background): “Common species comprise the dominant structure and overall biomass in ecosystems (Gaston and Fuller, 2008; Gaston, 2010; Thompson, 2010) and contribute significantly to spatial and temporal variance in species richness patterns (e.g. Lennon et al., 2010; Vazquez and Gaston, 2004).”
• Regional variation in climate change winners and losers highlights the rapid loss of cold‐dwelling species (2016, background): “Previous work has highlighted that common species contribute most both to geographic patterns of species richness (Lennon et al., 2011), and spatio-temporal changes in species richness (Davey et al., 2013).”