Politico–Economic Factors Associated with Interest in Starting a Business: A Multi–Country Study
By T. Begley, W. Tan, H. Schoch. 2005
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this article, we study the constructs of perceived environmental munificence and carrying capacity as they relate to potential for starting a business in samples taken from thirteen Anglo–Saxon, East Asian, and South Asian countries. Seven politico–economic dimensions represent perceived munificence and carrying capacity: financing available, supportive government regulation, market opportunities, access to support services, supply of skilled labor, connections needed, and competitive conditions. Perceived market opportunities, supply of skilled labor, and supportive government regulation (negatively) relate most consistently to start–up feasibility and desirability in the full sample. In regional subsamples, the only dimensions to associate with both feasibility and desirability are market opportunities in Anglo–Saxon countries and supply of skilled labor in South Asia.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e1d3006fc6f2ac5a5b7c09fda29d799249d2f6d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Roy Thurik
- David B. Audretsch
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- I. Verheul
- Matthias Fink
- Peter van der Zwan
- Ewald Kibler
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David B. Audretsch
- David Urbano
- Roy Thurik
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Peter van der Zwan
- I. Verheul
- Ewald Kibler
- Matthias Fink
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Roy Thurik
- Peter van der Zwan
- David B. Audretsch
- Matthias Fink
- Ewald Kibler
- David Urbano
- I. Verheul
- Sebastian Aparicio
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Entrepreneurial Passion and Creativity in Developing Entrepreneurial Intentions: Insights from American Homebrewers (2017, background): “…in recent studies, including entrepreneurship education (Bae et al. 2014; Souitaris, Zerbinati, and Al-Laham 2007), regional environmental factors (Begley, Tan, and Schoch 2005; Mueller, 2006), cognition in the opportunity recognition process (Teng 2007; Zahra, Korrib, and Yuk 2005), locus of…”
- Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence (2016, background): “Some authors show that entrepreneurs may be discouraged from starting a business if they have to follow many rules and procedures (Alvarez and Urbano, 2011; Begley et al., 2005; van Stel et al., 2007).”
- Incubator best practice: A framework (2008, background): “Critical resources include e.g. knowledge and technology, financial capital, market related resources and human capital (see e.g. Begley et al., 2005; Bollingtoft and Ulhoi, 2005; Hindle and Yencken, 2004; Mian, 1996a; Rice, 2002; Rickne, 2000).”
- The entrepreneurial ladder, gender, and regional development (2012, background): “In terms of perceptual variables, it has been observed that women are less optimistic than men and are often less confident about their entrepreneurial capabilities (Bengtsson et al. 2005; Verheul et al. 2005; Koellinger et al. 2007; Niederle and Vesterlund 2007).”
- The Past and the Future of International Entrepreneurship: A Review and Suggestions for Developing the Field (2009, background): “…Almeida (2000) Baird, Lyles, and Orris (1994) Baker, Gedajlovic, and Lubatkin (2005) Barringer and Greening (1998) Basu (1998) Begley and Tan (2001) Begley, Tan, and Schoch (2005) Beise-Zee and Rammer (2006) Berra, Piatti, and Giampaolo (1995) Bijmolt and Zwart (1994) Bloodgood, Sapienza, and…”
- Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural Central Europe: A comparative institutional analysis (2014, background): “…and simplified business laws, among other features, tend to support entrepreneurship (Gnyawali and Fogel, 1994; Klapper et al., 2006), even though regulatory efforts by governments can have no effect, or even a negative one, on entrepreneurship (Begley et al., 2005; Van Stel et al., 2007).”