Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments

By W. Gueth, Maria Vittoria Levati, Matthias Sutter, E. Heijden. 2007

395 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e1b63a1ae8a445c8a72f30fb4d7f8db6b1c44f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John A. List
2. Richard T. Carson
3. Matthias Sutter
4. John S. Ahlquist
5. Margaret Levi
6. Simon Gächter
7. Maria Vittoria Levati
8. E. Heijden

In Gender Studies

1. John S. Ahlquist
2. Margaret Levi
3. Matthias Sutter
4. John A. List
5. Simon Gächter
6. E. Renner

In Safety Research

1. Simon Gächter
2. Matthias Sutter
3. John A. List
4. E. Renner
5. Jonathan Woon
6. Maria Vittoria Levati
7. John S. Ahlquist
8. Margaret Levi

Citations in the corpus

• Leadership: What It Means, What It Does, and What We Want to Know About It (2011, methodology): “Levati et al. (2007) use a set up nearly identical to that of Güth et al. (2007) but allow players to have different initial endowments from which to contribute.”
• Making or breaking climate targets: : The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy (2015, neutral): “Thereisliteratureinsupportoftheidea that in situations of cooperation problems involving a public good, a leader setting a good example can play a role [6,7].”
• Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice (2014, methodology): “…condition is isomorphic to the “random lottery” approach used in experimental economics under which a subject makes k choices with one of them, randomly chosen, receiving a real payoff (e.g., Charness and Rabin 2002; Holt and Laury 2002; Gneezy, Niederle, and Rustichini 2003; Guth et al. 2007).14”
• Who Makes a Good Leader? Cooperativeness, Optimism, and Leading‐By‐Example (2012, background): “Recent experimental research has shown that followers respond strongly to the example set by a leader (Arbak and Villeval 2007; Gächter and Renner 2003, 2007; Güth et al. 2007; Kumru and Vesterlund forthcoming; Levati, Sutter, and Van Der Heijden 2007; Moxnes and Van Der Heijden 2003; Pogrebna et al”
• Leading by Example in a Public Goods Experiment with Heterogeneity and Incomplete Information (2007, methodology): “For the reader’s convenience, we have included in panel C of Table 2 the main results of Güth et al. (2007) for the case of symmetric endowments and complete information.”
• An Experimental Investigation of Electoral Delegation and the Provision of Public Goods (2011, background): “Other related experiments with leaders find that leadership by example can reduce free riding (Guth et al. 2007; Levati, Sutter, and van der Heijden 2007).”
• Leaders as role models and ‘belief managers’ in social dilemmas (2018, background): “For examples see Güth et al. (2007) , Van Vugt and Ahuja (2010) , Arbak and Villeval (2013) and”