Name Norms: A Guide to Casting Your Next Experiment

By L. Newman, M. Tan. 2018

37 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Adina Williams
2. Eric Michael Smith
3. Kawin Ethayarajh
4. Lauren A. Rivera
5. Christopher Potts
6. Tristan Thrush
7. Douwe Kiela
8. Robin Jia

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

1. Douwe Kiela
2. Robin Jia
3. Tristan Thrush
4. Kawin Ethayarajh
5. Adina Williams
6. Mohit Bansal
7. Samuel R. Bowman
8. Christopher Potts

Citations in the corpus

• Hi, my name is Martha: Using names to measure and mitigate bias in generative dialogue models (2021, methodology): “The lists of names have been constructed as follows: • Names split by gender: we use 383 names split by gender from Newman et al. (2018).”
• Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation (2019, background): “Anderson is a very common surname in the United States, and the first names John and Julie were suitable for our purposes because they send a clear gender signal but otherwise tend to elicit similar reactions with regard to perceived warmth and competence (Newman et al. 2018).”
• Dynaboard: An Evaluation-As-A-Service Platform for Holistic Next-Generation Benchmarking (2021, background): “We then also augmented that list with additional names popular in the literature [7, 48].”