How Strategic Entrepreneurship and The Institutional Context Drive Economic Growth

By Christian Bjørnskov, N. J. Foss. 2013

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d588ef58cb7162a0324efa2dc100717d9d463ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Information Systems

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

The Context of Entrepreneurial Judgment: Organizations, Markets, and Institutions (2019, background): “…in the task environment (e.g., Sarasvathy, 2001) over the general availability of entrepreneurial finance (ref) to the ‘intensity’ of entrepreneurship in the entrepreneur’s industry (Acs and Audretsch, year) to determinants at the political and institutional level (Bjørnskov and Foss, 2008, 2013).”
Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective (2018, unknown): “The idea that entrepreneurship and institutions are pivotal in explaining the variation in economic growth not accounted for by changes in factor inputs was a central implication of the ideas of William Baumol (1990; 1993; see also Bjørnskov and Foss 2013; 2016).”
Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments (2018, background): “lation, contract enforcement, as well as law and order (Hall and Jones 1999; Henrekson and Johansson 2009; Bjørnskov and Foss 2013).”
How Different Formal Institutions Affect Opportunity and Necessity Entrepreneurship (2015, background): “…public policies have devoted significant effort to proote entrepreneurship (Shane, 2009), especially since the eginning of the current economic crisis, as it is considred one of the drivers that can help improve this situation Baumol and Strom, 2007; Bjornskov and Foss, 2013; Estrin t al., 2013).”
Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence (2016, background): “This idea is also claimed by Bjørnskov and Foss (2013) and Nissan et al. (2011), who find that institutions affect economic growth, specifically formal institutions, such as procedures or the time needed to create a new business, indicating that regulation can influence the context in which…”
Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research (2014, background): “Fortunately, recent research highlights the important role of context in explaining entrepreneurial actions and their outcomes (Bjørnskov and Foss, 2013; Cabral et al., 2013; Foss et al., 2013; Sarasvathy and Venkataraman, 2011; Ucbasaran et al., 2001).”
Examining how the personality, self-efficacy, and anticipatory cognitions of potential entrepreneurs shape their entrepreneurial intentions (2018, background): “Entrepreneurs play a major role in fostering economic growth and job creation (Baron, 2006; Bjørnskov & Foss, 2013), hence the question of what spurs individuals to pursue entrepreneurial activities has been prevalent in the entrepreneurship literature.”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, methodology): “In this sense, Bjørnskov and Foss (2013) introduce institutions, specifically regulative institutions, into the production function.”
Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth: What Do We Know and What Do We Still Need to Know? (2016, unknown): “And yet, there is surprisingly little work that systematically links the antecedents of entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial activity itself, and the aggregate consequences thereof in a unified framework (Bjørnskov & Foss, 2008, 2013; Holcombe, 1998).”
How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries (2017, background): “…of public policies, as an environment providing quality and integrity of the legal system and protection of property rights tends to promote innovative behaviors and risk-taking (Bjørnskov & Foss, 2013), any government policy in this sensemay particularly favor potential opportunity entrepreneurs.”