Objective comparison of particle tracking methods

By Nicolas Chenouard, Ihor Smal, F. de Chaumont, Martin Maška, Ivo F. Sbalzarini, Yuanhao Gong, Janick Cardinale, C. Carthel, S. Coraluppi, Mark R. Winter and 25 more. Nature Methods, 2014

892 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Particle tracking is of key importance for quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamic processes from time-lapse microscopy image data. Because manually detecting and following large numbers of individual particles is not feasible, automated computational methods have been developed for these tasks by many groups. Aiming to perform an objective comparison of methods, we gathered the community and organized an open competition in which participating teams applied their own methods independently to a commonly defined data set including diverse scenarios. Performance was assessed using commonly defined measures. Although no single method performed best across all scenarios, the results revealed clear differences between the various approaches, leading to notable practical conclusions for users and developers.

Subfields: Biophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d580ebfbfb426a8c4f9a6678e5d5802b2f22b59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biophysics

  1. Kevin W. Eliceiri
  2. Curtis T. Rueden
  3. Johannes E. Schindelin
  4. Pavel Tomancak
  5. Florian Jug
  6. Albert Cardona
  7. Ellen T. A. Dobson
  8. Alexandra B. Schroeder

In Molecular Biology

  1. Curtis T. Rueden
  2. Johannes E. Schindelin
  3. Kevin W. Eliceiri
  4. Florian Jug
  5. Pavel Tomancak
  6. A. Senecal
  7. Jeetayu Biswas
  8. Maria Vera

Citations in the corpus