MABA-MABA or Abracadabra? Progress on Human–Automation Co-ordination

By Sidney W. A. Dekker, David D. Woods. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2002

349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Social Psychology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d43a004013c6a5fd65b6a8ef9e5d629268ea44b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. Dietrich Manzey
2. Thomas B. Sheridan
3. C. Wickens
4. Raja Parasuraman

In Social Psychology

1. C. Wickens
2. Raja Parasuraman
3. Dietrich Manzey
4. Thomas B. Sheridan
5. Linda Onnasch
6. Huiyang Li
7. Mica R. Endsley
8. Angelia L. Sebok

In Surgery

1. C. Wickens
2. Raja Parasuraman
3. Dietrich Manzey
4. Thomas B. Sheridan
5. M. Staal

Citations in the corpus

• Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration (2010, background): “…and opinion pieces (which have a tendency to overgeneralize and draw very broad conclusions), Dekker and colleagues (Dekker & Hollnagel, 2004; Dekker & Woods, 2002) proposed that terms such as complacency and situation awareness do not have scientific credibility but rather are simply…”
• Situation Awareness: Review of Mica Endsley's 1995 Articles on Situation Awareness Theory and Measurement (2008, background): “Finally, as any important concept should, it has spawned some degree of rigorous academic debate (Dekker & Hollnagel, 2004; Dekker & Woods, 2002).”
• Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation (2014, background): “…trade-off is complicated by the fact that “automation” is not an all-or-none concept, as it was often assumed to be in the classic human–machine task allocation analyses (e.g., the “Fitts List”; for a critique of those analyses, see Dekker & Woods, 2002; Parasura-man, Sheridan, & Wickens, 2008).”
• Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation: Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs (2008, methodology): “Throughout their article, Dekker & Woods (2002) stated that Parasuraman et al. (2000) are advocates of “substitution,” whereas no such advocacy is put forth other than to point out the fact that designers do in effect substitute because that is what they do when they adopt automation.”