The Elusive Quest for Global Governance Standards

By L. Bebchuk, Assaf Hamdani. 2009

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms (2017, background): “For instance, the shareholder laws that are relevant for public firms differ from those that are relevant for private firms (Bebchuk and Hamdani, 2009).”
What Matters and for Which Firms for Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets? Evidence from Brazil (and Other BRIK Countries) (2012, background): “Optimal governance likely differs between developed and emerging markets (e.g., Bebchuk and Hamdani, 2009), and potentially also between different emerging markets (Durnev and Fauver, 2007).”
The effectiveness of internal corporate governance and audit quality: the role of ownership concentration – Malaysian evidence (2018, background): “governance should not overlook the associated contingencies of ownership structure (Bebchuk and Hamdani, 2009; Desender et al., 2013).”
Connecting the Dots – Bringing External Corporate Governance into the Corporate Governance Puzzle (2015, unknown): “In this line, Bebchuk and Hamdani (2009) suggest that optimal governance is generally not one-size-fits-all and hence, a uniform scoring standard could lead to faulty rankings.”
Board gender diversity and dividend policy in Australian listed firms: the effect of ownership concentration (2019, unknown): “Second, ownership structure has a considerable influence on board decisions (Bebchuk & Hamdani, 2009).”