Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species

By Karin Johst, Martin Drechsler, Jeremy A. Thomas, Josef Settele. 2006

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cebe0d738ccbcf42a2443a532aac7ce5c34dab7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Herbivore and pollinator responses to grassland management intensity along experimental changes in plant species richness (2012, background): “, 2009), but it can also cause disturbance, fluctuation in resource availability and reductionof the structural complexity, depending on the temporal and spatial scale and management intensity considered (Johst et al., 2006; Pywell et al., 2011).”
How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands? (2008, background): “Management and altitude Another important habitat characteristic for species distribution is the quality of a habitat patch (Thomas et al. 2001), which can be improved by speciesspecific management strategies (Johst et al. 2006).”
Diversity and trait composition of moths respond to land-use intensification in grasslands: generalists replace specialists (2017, background): “…after intensification of land-use activities by the three most common management interventions, namely grazing, mowing and fertilization (Debinski et al. 2011; Johst et al. 2006; Krause and Culmsee 2013; Lanta et al. 2009; Moranz et al. 2012; Öckinger et al. 2006a; van den Berg et al. 2011).”
Quantifying the Contribution of Organisms to the Provision of Ecosystem Services (2009, background): “Quantification is at the heart of the SP concept and its value to policy makers and land managers is manifested through specific rather than vague management guidelines (Johst et al. 2006).”
The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, background): “A system almost exclusively driven by the land-use regime (hay cutting) can be found in Maculinea nausithous, Maculinea teleius and Lycaena dispar in South-West Germany (Johst et al. 2006).”
Agricultural management, vegetation traits and landscape drive orthopteran and butterfly diversity in a grassland–forest mosaic: a multi‐scale approach (2009, background): “…regular disturbance related to the periodic removal of the standing biomass and thus to fluctuations in resource availability and habitat stability (Johst et al., 2006), emigration and immigration to and from the surrounding landscape are expected to play an important role in shaping local…”
Impact of farm size and topography on plant and insect diversity of managed grasslands in the Alps (2009, background): “Moreover, the low cutting frequency of the steepest meadows (only once or twice a year) is likely to reduce egg destruction and larval mortality on the plants, thereby promoting higher population size and a reduced local extinction risk (Johst et al., 2006).”
How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold (2008, background): “…management not maintaining diverse vegetation architecture may threaten sensitive Lepidoptera (Balmer and Erhardt 2000; Warring 2001) and that some approaches supported within AES may not be compatible with the well-being of threatened species (e.g., Anthes et al. 2003; Johst et al. 2006).”
An agglomeration payment for cost-effective biodiversity conservation in spatially structured landscapes (2010, methodology): “…of the mowing regimes for each meadow in the case study region and the ecological model quantifies the effects of these 6 See Bergmann (2005) and Johst et al. (2006) for a detailed description of the agro-economic cost assessment and the ecological model. effects of different mowing regimes,…”
Impact of different meadow mowing techniques on field invertebrates (2010, background): “Many studies on butterflies have focused only on the adult stage, but it is the caterpillars that are more habitat specific, and therefore conservation attention has shifted to a consideration of larval habitat requirements and impacts of agriculture on these resources (e.g. Schwarzwälder et al. 199”