Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands; scientific integration for management and policy

By R. Turner, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, T. Söderqvist, A. Barendregt, Jan van der Straaten, E. Maltby, E. V. van Ierland. 2000

714 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ce33b4e2114e86859a71cf0082e9f6490d0edf3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Wetlands as Settings for Human Health: Incorporating Ecosystem Services and Health Impact Assessment into Water Resource Management (2011, background): “The quantification and valuation of wetland ecosystem services in a way that makes them comparable in value to the returns derived from alternative uses can facilitate improved policy- and decisionmaking (Turner et al. 2000).”
Human perturbations reduce dung beetle diversity and dung removal ecosystem function (2021, background): “Here, ecosystem functions are the result of the interactions between structures and processes that contribute to the maintenance of the ecosystem (Turner et al., 2000), and ecosystem services are the benefits that human populations obtain, directly and indirectly, from ecosystems (Boyd & Banzhaf,…”
The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation (2008, background): “We take the case of wetlands in order to provide some detail (Turner et al. 2000).”
The Welfare Economic Theory of Green National Accounts (2008, background): “Among a growing number of valuation studies, see Gren et al. (1994), Barbier and Strand (1998), Chichilnisky and Heal (1998), Turner et al. (2000), Boyer and Polasky (2004), Ricketts et al. (2004), Sekercioglu et al. (2004), Bin and Polasky (2005), Naidoo and Adamowicz (2005), Goldstein et al.…”
Towards a DPSIR driven integration of ecological value, water uses and ecosystem services for estuarine systems (2013, methodology): “From an ecological point of view, the Drivers-Pressures-Status-ImpactsResponses framework (hereafter DPSIR) (OECD, 1993) is considered an insightful framework for integrating quantitative and qualitative ecosystem/socio-economic interactions (Turner et al., 2000; Elliott, 2002; Borja et al., 2006; M”
Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland (2007, background): “…a quantifiable measure of benefit, as opposed to the more restrictive economic meaning of ‘monetary value’ or ‘dollar value’ (for a discussion about the relationship between different types of economic values and ecosystem functions, see Turner et al. 2000; de Groot et al. 2002; Hein et al. 2006).”
The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature (2006, background): “Within the group of studies that focuses on methodological issues in wetland valuation, some empirically test different survey or estimation techniques using real or hypothetical data whereas others are purely conceptual (e.g., Bergstrom and Stoll 1993; Bystrom et al. 2000; Turner et al. 2000).”
The economic value of wetlands in developing countries: a meta-regression analysis (2016, background): “While there is growing recognition of the need for their conservation, wetlands continue to be lost throughout the world (Turner et al. 2000).”
Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services (2017, background): “These goods may be material or immaterial, have value (monetary or otherwise) for people (Turner et al. 2000), and help to improve human well-being Human well-being Human well-being includes the basic requirements for satisfactory living conditions, freedom and choice, health, good social…”
Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa (2005, background): “Turner et al. (2000) suggest an integrated wetland research framework, which combines economic valuation, integrated modeling, stakeholder analysis and multicriteria evaluation.”
Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales (2006, background): “The importance of such integration has been emphasized (Harris, 2002; Wallace et al., 2003), and the use of indicators generated from these integrated approaches have been widely discussed (Bradbury, 1996; Turner et al., 2000; Kammerbauer et al., 2001; Sullivan, 2002; Yoffe and Ward, 1999).”