Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies

By Bart Nooteboom. 2000

1,275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cafe68cbe88d2c9bee4670d90597fdc9bb583b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity (2008, background): “Nooteboom (2000) claims that interfirm learning requires a certain degree of cognitive proximity between firms to enable effective communication, but not too much cognitive proximity to avoid lock-in.”
A Cognitive Theory of the Firm (2005, unknown): “The notion of cognitive distance forms the basis for a cognitive theory of the firm (Nooteboom 1992, 1999, 2000).”
How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions (2011, background): “As a matter of fact, a too strong overlap in competences might even lead to cognitive lock-in (Nooteboom, 2000).”
Models of knowledge and systems of governance (2005, background): “Variety of complementary competence is key in assessing the innovation capabilities, at both the firm and the system levels (Nooteboom, 2000).”
Ontological uncertainty and innovation (2005, background): “(1955) and, more recently, Nooteboom (2002). We hope in a future work to develop some points of”
Creative Imitation: Exploring the Case of Cross-Industry Innovation (2010, unknown): “These authors’ work is based on the evaluation of the cognitive distance between people who need to share a certain interpretation system (Weick, 1979, 1995), a system of shared meanings (Smircich, 1983) or an organizational focus (Nooteboom, 2000).”
The Geographies of Knowledge Transfers over Distance: Toward a Typology (2014, background): “The agenda of such meetings may be to reconfirm cognitive proximity and transform this into organizational proximity (Nooteboom 2000), as well as to establish a knowledge base that contains tacit and codified elements in a codified form (eg, technical handbook/codebook).”
Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience (2015, background): “The optimal level of cognitive proximity follows from the need to keep some cognitive distance (for the sake of new ideas) and to secure some cognitive proximity (to enable effective communication) (Cohendet and Llerena 1997; Nooteboom 2000; Gilsing et al. 2007; Broekel and Boschma 2012).”
Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance (2004, background): “This yields the notion of ‘cognitive distance,’ based on a constructivist, interactionist view of knowledge (Berger and Luckmann, 1967, Hendriks-Jansen, 1996, Mead, 1934, Nooteboom, 2000, Weick, 1979, 1995).”
The Business Governance of Localized Knowledge: An Information Economics Approach for the Economics of Knowledge (2006, background): “The notion of cognitive distance among agents plays a key role in this context: the degree of commonality among agents, in terms of shared codes and languages, interacts with the levels of knowledge tacitness (Nooteboom, 2000).”
Geographical and cognitive proximity effects on innovation performance in SMEs: a way through knowledge acquisition (2011, background): “Thus, similarity in perceiving, interpreting, understanding and evaluating among firms would be expected to facilitate a higher innovation, in spite of geographical distance (Nooteboom 2000).”