The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology

By S. Clayton. 2012

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bfee321e1a9357c384b676f11973cf82df579bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. L. Steg
2. K. Keizer
3. R. Gifford
4. R. Jones
5. Tobin N. Walton
6. E. van der Werff
7. S. Czellár
8. Christian Martin

Citations in the corpus

• Where do biospheric values come from? A connectedness to nature perspective (2017, background): “This theorizing is also compatible with the view of self-nature connection as a special form of social identity (Clayton, 2012a).”
• Environmental psychology matters. (2014, background): “Two comprehensive handbooks have appeared (Bechtel & Churchman 2002, Clayton 2012), and a third is in preparation.”
• The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour (2013, background): “…how environmental self-identity is related to other important concepts related to environmental behaviour, such as connectedness to nature, environmental concern, environmental attitudes and personal norms (e.g., Clayton, 2012; Schultz & Tabanico, 2007; Thøgersen, 2009; Weigel &Weigel, 1978).”
• Advancing sustainable consumption in the UK and China: the mediating effect of pro-environmental self-identity (2015, unknown): “…construct in helping to explain a spectrum of individual and collective (spillover) sustainable consumption behaviours of pro-environmental consumers (Clayton, 2012; Fielding, McDonald, & Louis, 2008; Kashima, Paladino, & Margetts, 2014; van der Werff, et al., 2013b; Whitmarsh & O'Neill, 2010).”
• Ecological Identity: The Development and Assessment of a Measurement Scale (2018, methodology): “By operationalizing differentiation, our work connects to recent research on intergroup bias, social comparison, and identity-protective cognition (Clayton, 2012; Gifford, 2011; McCright & Dunlap, 2011).”