Rural poverty in Latin America: Determinants and exit paths

By A. de Janvry, E. Sadoulet. 2000

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bb5cebc10db3f22f61fd5c2bc0f3ee8f4013470

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. Christopher B. Barrett
2. T. Reardon

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. K. Abay
2. G. Abate
3. A. Arcenas
4. Christopher B. Barrett
5. Tanguy Bernard
6. S. Pagiola
7. Michael R. Carter
8. M. Qaim

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Arcenas
2. Christopher B. Barrett
3. S. Pagiola
4. Michael R. Carter
5. Stefan Dercon
6. Christophe Béné
7. J. Skees
8. H. Michelson

Citations in the corpus

• Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua (2008, background): “Poorer households are less likely to have secure tenure, tend to have fewer savings and less access to credit, and are less likely to receive technical assistance (de Janvry and Sadoulet, 2000; López and Valdés, 2000).”
• Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua (2007, background): “Many of these barriers may be more salient for poorer households, who are less likely to have secure tenure, tend to have fewer savings and less access to credit, and are less likely to receive TA (de Janvry and Sadoulet, 2000; López and Valdés, 2000).”
• Correlated non-classical measurement errors, ‘Second best’ policy inference, and the inverse size-productivity relationship in agriculture (2019, background): “First, farmers may intentionally misreport their land area and crop production so as to conceal wealth and thereby avoid taxes or be found eligible for proxy means tested benefits of various types (Diskin (1997)).”
• The water question in feminism: water control and gender inequities in a neo-liberal era (2009, background): “…distress sales of both land and water rights reported throughout the Latin American continent provide a clear manifestation of this process of accumulation by dispossession (Ahlers 2005a; De Janvry and Sadoulet 2000; Deininger 2001; Fortis and Ahlers 1999; Ruben and Masset 2003; Thorpe 1997).”