Tracking Individuals Shows Spatial Fidelity Is a Key Regulator of Ant Social Organization
By Danielle Mersch, Alessandro Crespi, Laurent Keller. 2013
408 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Edwin Olson
- Raúl Rojas
- Tim Landgraf
- Nick Gravish
- John Wang
- Fernando Wario
- Benjamin Wild
- Stacey A. Combes
In Genetics
- Edwin Olson
- Raúl Rojas
- Tim Landgraf
- Nick Gravish
- John Wang
- Fernando Wario
- Benjamin Wild
- Stacey A. Combes
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- RenderGAN: Generating Realistic Labeled Data (2016, methodology): “A system, previously developed for ants (Mersch et al., 2013) was shown to successfully track 100 bees for 2 days Blut et al.”
- Automatic methods for long-term tracking and the detection and decoding of communication dances in honeybees (2015, methodology): “Only one marker-based system was developed in Lausanne (Mersch et al., 2013) for the use with a few hundred ants which were kept in an open arena.”
- BEEtag: A Low-Cost, Image-Based Tracking System for the Study of Animal Behavior and Locomotion (2015, background): “While such marker-systems have previously been used for high-throughput behavioral studies in ants [10], previous software packages are either not optimized for recognizing isolated tags (as desired for most applications in animal movement), or suffer from licensing issues, making access to these te”
- AprilTag 2: Efficient and robust fiducial detection (2016, methodology): “From top left, clockwise: robot-to-robot localization and identification on MAGIC robots, object localization for Boston Dynamics’ Atlas robot, testing of virtual reality headsets at Valve, and tracking individual ants to study their social organization [4].”