Conceptual Metaphors of Affect
By L. Elizabeth Crawford. 2009
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ba70e9a693fb6823853a3ad068ef3708dd641c5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- A. Foolen
- Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
- Andrea S. Heberlein
- Sian L. Beilock
- Raedy M. Ping
- Sonica Dhillon
- Anthony P. Atkinson
- Gerard Steen
In Social Psychology
- A. Foolen
- Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
- Andrea S. Heberlein
- Sian L. Beilock
- Raedy M. Ping
- Sonica Dhillon
- Anthony P. Atkinson
- Jean Decety
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory (2011, background): “There is also a growing literature from experimental social psychology revealing how conceptual metaphors influence different nonlinguistic, social perception and cognition (Crawford, 2009).”
- The relevance of emotion for language and linguistics (2012, background): “In the same perspective, Crawford (2009) argues against Lakoff & Johnson (1980)’s claim that the use of the physical domain to conceptualize the emotional domain is motivated by the concreteness of the former and the abstractness of the latter.”
- Reach For What You Like: The Body's Role in Shaping Preferences (2009, background): “Crawford (2009) also presents evidence that even metaphoric language about affect is based in perceptual and motor systems, such that language about positive affect is associated with being spatially higher. Moreover, effects such as those presented above go beyond the evaluation of valenced informa”
- Neuroscientific Evidence for Simulation and Shared Substrates in Emotion Recognition: Beyond Faces (2009, background): “As such, these models are consonant with theories of embodied cognition, which emphasize the utilization of body representations in a variety of behaviors from memory to attitude formation (Barsalou, Kyle Simmons, Barbey, & Wilson, 2003; Niedenthal, Barsalou, Winkielman, Krauth-Gruber, & Ric, 2005; ”