School Racial Composition and Adolescent Racial Homophily

By K. Joyner, Grace S Kao. 2000

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b7d5b9818e4ef5eec7caeb122fa724018b83fe0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Cross-ethnic friendships: Are they really rare? Evidence from secondary schools around London (2014, unknown): “First, we accounted for the percentage of available same-ethnic peers in the classroom which has been found to affect the formation of cross-ethnic friendships and may restrict cross-ethnic friendship selection (Joyner & Kao, 2000; Moody, 2001).”
The Old Boy (and Girl) Network: Social Network Formation on University Campuses (2008, background): “6 For analyses of secondary school social interaction and connectedness, see Joyner and Kao (2000), Moody (2001), Quillian and Campbell (2003), Weinberg (2005), Fryer and Torelli (2006), and Babcock (2006).”
School segregation and academic achievement among Hispanic children (2007, background): “Thus, schools with large proportions of high-SES students are likely to provide opportunities for all students to develop valuable social capital that may facilitate academic success (Conger et al., 1997; Dornbusch et al., 1987; Lareau, 1989; Carbonaro, 1998; Coleman, 1988; HoVerth et al., 1999; Mor”
When Does Race Matter? Race, Sex, and Dating at an Elite University (2010, background): “Studies of friendship choice among high school students indicate that geographic proximity does increase interracial friendship (Joyner & Kao, 2000; Moody, 2001), but (after adjusting for group size and opportunities for interracial contact) the propensity to form interracial friendships differs by…”
Bridging the Ethnic Divide: Student and School Characteristics in African American, Asian-Descent, Latino, and White Adolescents' Cross-Ethnic Friend Nominations (2005, unknown): “This calculation was a z-score variant of Laumann and colleagues’ homophily index (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994, as cited in Joyner & Kao, 2000), and involved observed (p) and expected (p), values as z ¼ p ppðpð1 pÞ=nÞ ; where p is the total number of friend nominations ofmembers of…”