The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – Does the locus of policies matter?

By M. Peters, Malte H. G. Schneider, Tobias Griesshaber, V. H. Hoffmann. 2012

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b68f1642a4b70fe88e46ea1c83f97ab95b62c6c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Environmental regulation and innovation in renewable energy technologies: Does the policy instrument matter? (2020, background): “The change in the installed capacity controls for the incentives of the solar and wind power industry to innovate because of general market opportunities for power plants manufacturers (Peters et al. 2012).”
Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector (2015, background): “Relevant policy instruments are conventionally classified in the two broad categories of demand-pull and technology-push instruments (e.g., Horbach et al., 2012; Peters et al., 2012; Rennings, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.011 0048-7333/© 2015 Elsevier B.V.”
Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany (2018, background): “For technology push, we focus on public R&D funding in the home market (Peters et al., 2012), which arguably for most of the companies in our sample is Germany (n= 360) and Europe (n=333).”
The Effect of Local and Global Learning on the Cost of Renewable Energy in Developing Countries (2016, background): “This form of learning is driven more by global markets than by policies in individual countries (Peters et al., 2012).”
The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries (2015, background): “…inducement effect of weak regulatory pressures (Ghisetti and Quatraro, 2013), and the net effects exerted by mixed policies1 (Jänicke and Lindemann, 2010; Schmidt et al., 2012; Costantini and Crespi, 2013) and neighboring countries’ policies (Peters et al., 2012) on the direc- and Crespi, 2013).”
Induced innovation in clean energy technologies from foreign environmental policy stringency? (2019, background): “Only a handful of other researchers explore the phenomenon of cross-border, policy induced innovation in clean energy technologies (Peters et al., 2012; Dechezleprêtre & Glachant, 2014; Nesta et al., 2014; Groba, 2014).”
Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy (2018, background): “…rationales— at least in the short and medium terms—between the push for innovation, and the secure, timely, and cost-efficient delivery of a policy or a public service on the one hand and the long-term economic effects of the diffusion policy on the other (Edler 2016; Peters et al. 2012).”
2 °C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall? (2016, background): “To avoid unavailability of specific technologies, complementary technology policies (Somanathan et al 2014) could reduce additional costs (Kalkuhl et al 2013, Bertram et al 2015b) and ensure innovation activity, such as for CCS (von Stechow et al 2011) or PV (Peters et al 2012).”
The impact of the German feed-in tariff scheme on innovation: Evidence based on patent filings in renewable energy technologies (2017, methodology): “Our empirical analysis is based on a panel dataset with annual observations from 1990-2014.”